So this weeks question focuses on whether
lack of regulation on the web leads to productive independence or the
expression of toxic behaviours. The answer to that is, quite simply, both! Just
like anything else ever invented, the internet is used for both good and bad,
and most of the time it depends on the individual using it. Cyberspace - that
'non-existant' plane between 'here' and there', your computer and mine - has
become a platform for people to completely and freely express themselves,
without the limits and repercussions that would occur in meat space. For
artists and musicians, it has become a platform for them to productively and
independently promote their music, share their art and even gather funds in
order to make these creative endeavors possible. Take the brilliant site ‘Kickstarter’, for example.
Since Kickstarter’s launch in just 2009, 4.9 million people have pledged $796 million
and funded 48,000 art projects. Wow! There’s also sites such as Wikipedia which
allow you to access information on a wide variety of topics, free of charge;
this alone will allow individuals to personally and professionally develop
without the reliance on institutions and classroom based learning. In meat
space, there’s a large amount of dependence on what other companies tell you.
For example, you are only given as much information as BBC news wish to divulge
on a situation, and often there is a slant on this news. The internet allows
anybody the advantage to seek the information they want to know – they control
what they want to see and hear, and this does indeed lead to a state of
adaptive and productive independence. The problem with this comes the major
increase of confirmation
bias – people will only Google search the terms which support their point
of view, so this alone can lead to a blinding effect on the internet.
Now for the downsides. With cyberspace comes
anonymity, and with anonymity comes the freedom to say and do anything you
would normally refrain from in meatspace. It is incredibly easy to become the
victim of verbal abuse and harassment without even knowing the name and face of
your attacker, and through the distance of CMC (computer mediated
communication), it's equally very easy to insult somebody forgetting that there
is a real person on the receiving side. The worst and most disturbing aspect of
the internet is the increasing opportunities for paedophiles to gain access to
child pornography, meet and groom children online and otherwise express
behaviours that would normally be latent through a fear of detection. Behind
the veil of the internet, these individuals are free to express these
behaviours and it is extremely difficult to catch them. This is not to say that
the internet has created paedophiles and cyber bullies, but more that
cyberspace has given them a platform to freely express these aspects of their
personality. The internet has even given murderers easier access to victims
(see the craigslist
killer). When addressing behaviour like this, it's clear that the internet
does indeed foster dangerous situations.
There have been attempts to regulate
the internet, and individual cases of people jailed
through cyberbullying, however, these are just attempts. I don’t personally
believe cyberspace could truly be regulated - even back in the days of ARPANET,
employers tried to keep the use of the network to work based activities and
that type of regulation failed. You also have to pose the question of who would
regulate it, and how? In the words of John Perry Barlow 'legal concepts of
property, expression, identity, movement, and context do not apply to us. They
are based on matter, There is no matter here…’ (A declaration
of the independence of cyberspace, 1996).
Whether this freedom helps aspiring artists
and musicians, and individuals who want to take control of their own media, or
is used as a platform for a new wave of crimes and endangerment that not even
the government can successfully control, there is no doubt that cyberspace
really has extended our abilities, for both good and evil.
Until
next time,
Philippa.
Philippa.
No comments:
Post a Comment